Clinical TopicsCommunityLetters to the EditorPatient SafetyProfessional DevelopmentWorkplace ManagementYour Health

Letters to the Editor – May 2007

Share

Show us the money
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea of employing nurses in or near retirement to increase the size of the professional workforce, as suggested in “Using our gold mine to compensate for our deficit” in the March issue of American Nurse Today. But simple fixes such as retaining or “re-recruiting” experienced nurses will not increase the size of the nurse workforce. Money will.
We need money for workplace redesign so nurses without the strength and stamina of a 30-year-old can still perform their jobs, money for nursing education, and money for better salaries to retain faculty and clinically based nurses who are considering retirement.
I believe the nursing shortage reflects a misalignment of America’s healthcare financing priorities, and asking our experienced nurses to hang around for a few more years doesn’t begin to solve the problem.  Our healthcare policymakers need to dedicate resources to solving the nursing shortage, or it will only get worse.
Teresa T. Goodell, PhD, RN, CNS, CCRN, APRN,BC
Portland, OR

Valuable info—and a good read
Thank you for American Nurse Today and all the valuable information it provides. I especially appreciate the many updates on current trends, such as “Six hot drugs for today and beyond” and “Using our gold mine to compensate for our deficit” in the March issue. Reading American Nurse Today is a good way of educating nurses, so we can be more productive in what we do.
I really have a good time reading this magazine. I hope it will be around for a long time.
Genoveva Bell, BSN, RN
Tacoma, WA

Wrong move
As a retired nurse practitioner, I am enjoying American Nurse Today very much. I was especially delighted to see “Tired of being tired? Try Pilates!” in the January issue. I started regular Pilates in 2006, at age 69 and became a different person physically, mentally, and spiritually within a few weeks. I regret that we didn’t teach Pilates instead of “body mechanics” 50 years ago, when I started in nursing.

I do have some concerns that the article and photos show advanced-level Pilates, especially the photo for the 100’s. I fear some novices might try that and hurt themselves. I think that articles such as this one should focus on beginning-level exercises or be clearly labeled as advanced-level Pilates that should not be attempted without the assistance of a certified Pilates instructor.

Thanks again for a great publication!
Ann C. Shepard, MS, RN,C
Detroit Lakes, MN

Author’s response
Thanks so much for your observations about the Pilates article. The four exercises described in the article are considered beginner exercises in the Pilates system. But as you point out, the exercise pictured would be a very difficult (and incorrect) position from which to do the “100’s.” The picture should actually be included as part 2 of the “Rolling Back” exercise. The “100’s” picture was mistakenly omitted.
Colleen Wenrich, RN

Quality care for GTMO detainees
I am responding to “Searching for transparency at Guantanamo Bay” in the February issue of American Nurse Today.

I am a registered nurse and former U.S. Naval Hospital Commanding Officer (CEO) and Joint Task Force Surgeon (JTF) for Joint Task Force Guantanamo Bay (GTMO). I was the JTF GTMO Surgeon from January 2002 to July 2003 and was responsible to the JTF commander for all aspects of the health care delivered to the detainees.

Since the inception of this mission, the detainees have received a standard of care equivalent to that received by American service members. This standard of care is unmatched in quality and includes strict attention to the Code of Ethics.

Our nursing colleagues in the United States and internationally can be proud of the quality of care delivered by GTMO nurses and all nurses who have chosen to serve in uniform during this most difficult time.

Albert J. Shimkus, Jr., MA, RN, CRNA
Captain, Nurse Corps, United States Navy, Retired
Portsmouth, RI  O

 

We welcome your comments. You may submit letters to the editor electronically at www.AmericanNurseToday.com by clicking on the “Letters to the Editor” link on the top menu. Or you may send them by regular mail to: Letters to the Editor, American Nurse Today, c/o HealthCom Media, 259 Veterans Lane, 3rd Floor, Doylestown, PA 18901. Please include your full name, credentials, city, state, and daytime phone number or e-mail address. Letters should contain no more than 250 words and will be edited for grammar, length, content, and clarity. All letters are considered American Nurse Today property and therefore unconditionally assigned to American Nurse Today.

Are you interested in sharing your input?
Please consider sending an electronic Letter to the Editor to share your opinion on American Nurse Journal content.

What are the guidelines for letter submissions?
Letters should be fewer than 275 words and take as their starting point an article published in American Nurse Journal in the past 2 months. Letters should be exclusive to American Nurse Journal and not submitted to or published in any other media. They must include the writer’s full name. Anonymous letters and letters written under pseudonyms will not be considered. Writers should disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject matter of their letters. Letters should not contain attachments.

Letters are screened prior to approval for posting; not all will be posted. We do not respond to requests for medical or legal advice. No material is intended to be a substitute for professional medical and legal advice.

cheryl meeGet your free access to the exclusive newsletter of American Nurse Journal and gain insights for your nursing practice.

NurseLine Newsletter

  • Hidden

*By submitting your e-mail, you are opting in to receiving information from Healthcom Media and Affiliates. The details, including your email address/mobile number, may be used to keep you informed about future products and services.

Test Your Knowledge

Which of the following is correct regarding pulse oximetry?

Recent Posts