Letters to the Editor

Response to ‘Future of Nursing’ report

Share
By: Sharon Hendricks, DNP, AGACNP-BC/FNP-C/CNM

In reading the piece written by the journal’s editor-in-chief regarding the future of nursing I was impressed with the sweeping reform goals. I was somewhat disappointed however by the expert committees’ #6 goal. Not that I disagree that nursing needs to increase the number of PhD-prepared nurses. Instead I was disappointed that yet again nursing has failed to recognize the importance of the DNP prepared clinician.

While research focused nurses promote the growth and support of nursing theory our profession needs to finally demand that practicing NP clinicians are as equally educationally prepared as our healthcare counterparts (MD, PT, etc.). Instead as a profession we continue to support a multi-level NP education system that by design keeps our profession from the ability to demand equality in practice issues.

As a long time (25 yr APN) NP provider I understand the resistance to this movement. Having said this, I also know that obtaining my DNP has not only given me an expanded view of healthcare needed to address the global issues facing our profession, but has also prepared me to be a clinical patient healthcare expert. Nursing needs to promote and increase both PhD and DNP practitioners as these are opposite sides of the same coin. Both are required one to perform research the other to institute and support clinical findings that promote and enact nursing research findings then recommending additional care gaps for future research.

Just my thoughts and reflections on future nursing profession goals. The importance of and contribution by nurses to positive patient outcomes has long been downplayed within the healthcare system. As the rest of our country moves towards equality nursing needs to recognize that our fight for professional equality is long overdue.

Sharon Hendricks, DNP, AGACNP-BC/FNP-C/CNM
Lamar, CO

Are you interested in sharing your input?
Please consider sending an electronic Letter to the Editor to share your opinion on American Nurse Journal content.

What are the guidelines for letter submissions?
Letters should be fewer than 275 words and take as their starting point an article published in American Nurse Journal in the past 2 months. Letters should be exclusive to American Nurse Journal and not submitted to or published in any other media. They must include the writer’s full name. Anonymous letters and letters written under pseudonyms will not be considered. Writers should disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject matter of their letters. Letters should not contain attachments.

Letters are screened prior to approval for posting; not all will be posted. We do not respond to requests for medical or legal advice. No material is intended to be a substitute for professional medical and legal advice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.


cheryl meeGet your free access to the exclusive newsletter of American Nurse Journal and gain insights for your nursing practice.

NurseLine Newsletter

  • Hidden

*By submitting your e-mail, you are opting in to receiving information from Healthcom Media and Affiliates. The details, including your email address/mobile number, may be used to keep you informed about future products and services.

Test Your Knowledge

Which of the following is correct regarding pulse oximetry?

Recent Posts